Method and apparatus for preventing illegal copy or illegal installation of information of optical recording medium5805551Abstract A recording and reproducing system for performing the reproduction using an optical recording medium. A physical feature of a ROM type disk is extracted and enciphered before being recorded in an optical disk. The cipher reproduced and converted into a plain text physical feature, which in turn, is compared with the physical feature information detected from the ROM disk. When both are coincident with each other, the operation of the system stops, thereby preventing the use of an illegally duplicated disk. The physical feature information, recorded on a magnetic recording layer 4 of the optical recording medium 2, is reproduced by an optical head 8 and compared with the information measured by a physical feature information detector, thereby detecting a duplicated medium. Claims What is claimed is: Description BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
______________________________________
Summary of the Invention
.cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P2-P7
Brief Description of the Drawings
.cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P7-P14
Description of Reference Marks
.cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P14-P30
Table of Contents of the Embodiments and
.cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P31
Corresponding Drawings
First Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P32
Second Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P39
Third Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P52
Fourth Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P59
Fifth Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P65
Sixth Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P67
Seventh Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P70
Eighth Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P75
Ninth Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P80
Tenth Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P81
Eleventh Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P81
Twelfth Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P82
Thirteenth Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P87
fourteenth Embodiment .cndot. .cndot. .cndot. P92
______________________________________
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a mastering apparatus for a recording system according to a preferred second embodiment of this invention; FIG. 2A is an illustration of variation of linear velocity with time at recording in the second embodiment; FIG. 2B is an illustration of address locations on an optical disk at 1.2 m/s in the second embodiment; FIG. 2C is an illustration of address locations on an optical disk at 1.2 m/s.fwdarw.1.4 m/s; FIG. 3A is an illustration of a physical arrangement of addresses of a legal CD in the second embodiment; FIG. 3B is an illustration of a physical arrangement of addresses of an illegally duplicated CD in the second embodiment; FIG. 4(a) is an illustration of the relationship between rotational pulses for a disk and time in the second embodiment; FIG. 4(b) is an illustration of the relationship between a physical position signal and time in the second embodiment; FIG. 4(c) is an illustration of the relationship between address information and time; FIG. 5 is an illustration for describing a duplicate preventing principle for a CD in the second embodiment; FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a recording and reproducing system according to the second embodiment; FIG. 7 is a flow chart for check of an illegally duplicated disk in the second embodiment; FIG. 8A is a process illustration of a CD with an ID number recorded in a first embodiment; FIG. 8B is an illustration of an process for a prior art CD; FIG. 9A is a top view of a magnetizing device in the first embodiment; FIG. 9B is a side elevational view showing a magnetizing device in the second embodiment; FIG. 9C is an enlarged side elevational view showing the magnetizing device in the second embodiment; FIG. 9D is a block diagram showing the magnetizing device in the second embodiment; FIG. 10 is an illustration of the principle of ID number input in the first embodiment; FIG. 11A is an illustration of the relationship between a linear velocity and time at a constant linear velocity in the second embodiment; FIG. 11B is an illustration of the relationship between a linear velocity and time at variation of the linear velocity in the second embodiment; FIG. 11C is an illustration of a physical arrangement of addresses at a constant linear velocity in the second embodiment; FIG. 11D is an illustration of a physical arrangement of addresses at variation of the linear velocity in the second embodiment; FIG. 12A is a cross-sectional view of a legal original record in the second embodiment; FIG. 12B is a cross-sectional view showing a legally formed disk in the second embodiment; FIG. 12C is a cross-sectional view showing an illegally duplicated original record in the second embodiment; FIG. 12D is a cross-sectional view showing an illegally duplicated formed disk in the second embodiment; FIGS. 13, 13A and 13B are a block diagram showing a CD fabricating device and recording and reproducing system in the second embodiment; FIGS. 14, 14A, 14B and 14C are a flow chart of the second embodiment; FIG. 15 an illustration of an address arrangement on a disk original record in the second, fourth and seventh embodiments; FIG. 16 is a block diagram showing a recording and reproducing system in the second embodiment; FIG. 17A is a cross-sectional view showing an illegal disk in a third embodiment; FIG. 17B is a cross-sectional view showing a legal disk in the third embodiment; FIG. 17C is an illustration of a waveform of an optical regenerative signal in the third embodiment; FIG. 17D is an illustration of a digital signal in the third embodiment; FIG. 17E is an illustration of an envelope waveform in the third embodiment; FIG. 17F is an illustration of a digital waveform in the third embodiment; FIG. 17G is an illustration of a waveform of a detection signal in the third embodiment; FIG. 18 illustrates a disk physical arrangement table in the third embodiment; FIG. 19A is an illustration of an address arrangement on an optical disk which is not in an eccentric condition, in the third embodiment; FIG. 19B is an illustration of an address arrangement of an optical disk which is in an eccentric condition, in the third embodiment; FIG. 20A is an illustration of tracking displacement of a legal disk in the third embodiment; FIG. 20B is an illustration of tracking displacement of an illegally duplicated disk in the third embodiment; FIG. 21A shows an address An in the third embodiment; FIG. 21B illustrates an angle Zn in the third embodiment; FIG. 21C shows an tracking displacement Tn in the third embodiment; FIG. 21D illustrates a pit depth Dn in the third embodiment; FIG. 22 is illustrative of a laser output, pit depth and regenerative signal in the third embodiment; FIG. 23 is illustrative of a duplicate preventing effect relating to each original record fabricating apparatus in the second and third embodiments; FIGS. 24, 24A, 24B, 24C and 24D are a block diagram showing an original record fabricating apparatus in the second and third embodiments; FIGS. 25, 25A, 25B, 25C and 25D are a block diagram showing an original record fabricating apparatus in the second and third embodiments; FIGS. 26, 26A, 26B, 26C and 26D are a block diagram showing an original record fabricating apparatus in the second and third embodiments; FIGS. 27, 27A, 27B, 27C and 27D are a block diagram showing an original record fabricating apparatus in the second and third embodiments; FIGS. 28, 28A, 28B, 28C and 28D are a block diagram showing an original record fabricating apparatus in the second and third embodiments; FIG. 29 is a block diagram wholly showing an original record fabricating system in the second and third embodiments; FIG. 30A is an illustration of a waveform of a laser output in the third embodiment; FIG. 30B is an illustration of a waveform of a laser output in the third embodiment; FIG. 30C is a cross-sectional view showing a substrate in the third embodiment; FIG. 30D is a cross-sectional view showing a substrate in the third embodiment; FIG. 30E is a cross-sectional view showing, a formed disk in the third embodiment; FIG. 31 is an illustration of the relationship between an laser recording output and regenerative signal in the third embodiment; FIG. 32 is illustrative of a process for an original recording fabrication in the third embodiment; FIG. 33A is a top view showing a fabricated original record in the third embodiment; FIG. 33B is a transverse cross-sectional view showing a press die for an original record in the third embodiment; FIG. 34 illustrates a process for an original record fabrication in the third embodiment; FIG. 35A is a top view showing a fabricated original record in the third embodiment; FIG. 35B is a transverse cross-sectional view showing an original record and press die in the third embodiment; FIG. 36 is a flow chart showing a process for fabricating an original record and for manufacturing a recording medium in the third embodiment; FIG. 37 is a flow chart showing a disk check method in the third embodiment; FIG. 38 is a block diagram showing disk formation in the third embodiment; FIGS. 39, 39A and 39B are a block diagram showing a low-reflection portion position detecting section in the third embodiment; FIGS. 40, 40A and 40B are a block diagram showing a recording and reproducing system in the third embodiment; FIG. 41A is a top view of a disk in a fourth embodiment; FIG. 41B is a top view of a disk in the first embodiment; FIG. 41C is a top view of a disk in the first embodiment; FIG. 41D is a transverse cross-sectional view showing a disk in the first embodiment; FIG. 41E is an illustration of a waveform of a regenerative signal in the first embodiment; FIG. 42 illustrates a principle for position detection of an address and clock of a low-reflection portion in a fourth embodiment; FIG. 43 is an illustration of comparison between low-reflection portion address tables of a legal disk and duplicated disk in the fourth embodiment; FIG. 44 is a flow chart showing a disk check using a one direction function in the second, third and fourth embodiments; FIG. 45 is an illustration of coordinate positions of original records in the second embodiment; FIG. 46 is a flow chart of a low-reflection position detection program in the fourth embodiment; FIGS. 47A, 47B and 47C are flow illustrations of a manufacturing method of a low-reflection portion in the fourth embodiment; FIG. 48A and 48B are flow illustrations of a manufacturing method of a low-reflection portion in the fourth embodiment; FIG. 49 is a flow illustration of a manufacturing method of a low-reflection portion in the fourth embodiment; FIG. 50 is a flow illustration of a manufacturing method of a low-reflection portion in the fourth embodiment; FIG. 51 is a top view showing a disk in the fourth embodiment; FIG. 52 shows a data structure of a master cipher in a six embodiment; FIG. 53 is an illustration of physical formation in the six embodiment; FIG. 54 is an illustration of a principle for duplicate detection by an error CP code in a fifth embodiment; FIG. 55 is an illustration of a principle for duplicate detection by an EFM patent code in a fifth embodiment; FIG. 56 is an illustration of a duplicate preventing EFM conversion table in the fifth embodiment; FIGS. 57, 58A and 57B are flow chart showing a selection method of a plurality of sub-cipher encoders in the sixth embodiment; FIGS. 58, 58A and 58B are flow chart showing an install allowing method in the sixth embodiment; FIG. 59 is a principle illustration of a disk based on a duplicate preventing method using an optical mark in the first embodiment; FIG. 60 shows a manufacturing process of a low-reflection portion of an optical disk in a seventh embodiment; FIG. 61 illustrates a manufacturing process of first and second low-reflection portions in the seventh embodiment; FIG. 62A is a block diagram showing a recording and reproducing system based on an off-track method in an eighth embodiment; FIG. 62B is an illustration of tracking in an on-track condition according to an off-track method in the eighth embodiment; FIG. 62C is an illustration of tracking in an off-track condition due to an off-track method in the eighth embodiment; FIG. 63 is an principle illustration of a duplicate preventing method based on a combination of an arrangement angle detecting method and an off-track signal method in the eighth embodiment; FIG. 64A is a top view showing a foreign material arrangement on a label surface of a CD in a ninth embodiment; FIG. 64B shows a displaying state of a CD in a display section in the ninth embodiment; FIG. 65 illustrates a displaying state state of an error message in a display section in the ninth embodiment; FIG. 66 is a flow chart showing a cleaning display in the ninth embodiment; FIG. 67 is an illustration of a manufacturing process of a bar code due to cutting in the seventh embodiment; FIG. 68 is an illustration of a manufacturing process of first and second reflection films in the seventh embodiment; FIGS. 69, 69A and 69B are block diagram showing a magnetic recording system in an eleventh embodiment; FIG. 70 is a flow chart showing an operation of the eleventh embodiment; FIG. 71 is a flow chart showing an operation of the eleventh embodiment; FIG. 72 is a flow chart showing an operation of the eleventh embodiment; FIG. 73 is a flow chart showing an operation of the eleventh embodiment; FIG. 74 is a flow chart showing an operation of the eleventh embodiment; FIG. 75 is a flow chart showing an operation of the eleventh embodiment; FIG. 76 is an illustration of a data hierarchical structure of a ROM section and RAM section of an optical disk in the eleventh embodiment; FIG. 77 is a block diagram showing an image encoding section in an twelfth embodiment; FIG. 78 is a block diagram showing an image compressing encoder in the twelfth embodiment; FIG. 79 is a flow chart showing an operation of the twelfth embodiment; FIG. 80 is a flow chart showing an install program in the first embodiment; FIG. 81 is an illustration of display on a screen in the first embodiment; FIGS. 82, 82A and 82B are block diagram showing a recording and reproducing system according to the first embodiment; FIGS. 83, 83A and 83B are flow chart showing encryption in a thirteenth embodiment; FIG. 84 is a flow chart showing a main cipher in the thirteenth embodiment; FIG. 85 is a flow chart showing a reflecting film recording routine in the thirteenth embodiment; FIG. 86 is a flow chart at disk reproduction in the thirteenth embodiment; FIG. 87 is a flow chart showing a decryption in the thirteenth embodiment; FIG. 88A is a block diagram showing a mastering apparatus in a fourteenth embodiment; FIG. 88B is a block diagram showing a mastering apparatus in a fourteenth embodiment; FIG. 89 is a flow chart showing formation of an original record in the fourteenth embodiment; FIG. 90 is a block diagram showing an information processing unit in the fourteenth embodiment; FIG. 91 is a flow chart at information reproduction in the fourteenth embodiment; FIG. 92 shows a reproduction principle of an in-phase signal in the eighth embodiment; FIG. 93A is illustrative of the principle of a two-point coincidence system in the eighth embodiment; FIG. 93B is illustrative of the principle of a three-point coincidence system in the eighth embodiment; FIG. 94 is illustrative of four-point coincidence system in the eighth embodiment; FIG. 95 is a first flow chart in the thirteenth embodiment; FIG. 96 is a second flow chart in the thirteenth embodiment; and FIG. 97 is a top view showing a second low-reflection portion in the seventh embodiment. Reference marks used in the drawings will be described hereinbelow for reference.
______________________________________
1 recording and reproducing system
2 recording medium
2M original record
3 magnetic recording layer
4 optical recording layer
5 optical transmission layer
6, 6M optical head
7 optical recording block
8 magnetic head
8a main magnetic pole
8b magnetic sub-pole
8c head cap
8e uniform magnetic field area
8m magnetic field modulation magnetic head
8s canceling magnetic head
9 magnetic recording block
10M system control section
17, 17M motor
18 optical head
19 head base
23, 23M head moving actuator
23a traverse actuator
24a traverse movement circuit
24, 24M tracking circuit
30 memory
34a memory (for system)
37 optical recording circuit
37a time base circuit
37b optical recording section
37c optical output section
37d combination section
38 frame synchronizing signal
38a clock reproduction circuit
40 coil
40a magnetic field modulation coil
40b magnetic recording coil
40c tap
40d tap
40e tap
41 slider
42 disk cassette
43 printing ground layer
44 printing area
45 printing
46 pit
47 substrate
48 optical reflective layer
49 printing ink
50 protective layer
51 arrow
52 optical recording signal
54 lens
57 light-emitting section
60 adhesive layer
61 magnetic recording signal
65 optical track
66 focal point
67 magnetic track
67a recording magnetic track
67b reproduction magnetic track
67s servo magnetic track
67f guard band
67g guard band
67x cleaning track
69 high .mu. magnetic layer
70 head gap
70a recording head gap
70b reproduction head gap
81 interference layer
84 reflective layer
85 modulated magnetic field
85a magnetic flux
85b magnetic flux
150 coupling section
201 decision step
202 reproduction step
203 reproduction copy step
204 reproduction dedicated step
205 recording copy step
206 recording step
207 copy step
210 demagnetizing area
210a demagnetizing area
210b demagnetizing area
301 shutter
302 head hole
303 liner hole
304 liner
305 liner supporting section
305a movable section
305b sub-liner supporting section
305c liner elevating section
307 channel
307a liner driving channel
310 liner pin
311 liner pin guide
312 pin driving lever
313 recognition hole
314 protective pin
315 liner driving section
316 pin shaft
317 spring
318 coupling portion
319 pin shutter
320 optical address
321a center
321b center
321c center
322 optical data train
323 address
324 data
325 guard band
326 track group
327 block
328 track data
328 synchronizing signal
329 address
330 parity
331 data
333 separation circuit
334 modulation circuit
335 disk circuit angle detecting section
336 eccentricity correction memory
337 signal-free area
338 traverse control section
339 table showing correspondence between optical
address and magnetic address
340 head amplifier
341 demodulator
342 error check section
343 data separation section
344 AND circuit
345 recording data
346 light-free address area
347 optical address area
348 magnetic TOC area
349 track locus
350 head reproduction section
351 memory data
352 coating material barrel
353 coating material transfer roll
354 intaglio drum
355 etching section
356 scriber
357 soft transfer roll
358 coating section
360 magnetic shield
361 resin section
362 random magnetic field generator
363 traverse shaft
363b magnetic head traverse shaft
364 positional reference section
365 disk lock section
366 traverse coupling section
367 traverse gear
367c magnetic head traverse gear
368 reference table
369 synchronizing section
370 recording format
371 track number section
372 data section
373 CRC section
374 gap portion
375 guide section for coupling section
376 disk cleaning section
377 magnetic head cleaning section
378 noise canceller
380 coupling section for disk cleaning section
381 magnetic sensor
382 optical reduction clock signal
383 magnetic lock signal
384 magnetic recording signal
385 decision window time
386 opdcal sensor
387 optical mark
387a bar code
388 light-transmitting section
389 upper cover
390 cassette cover
391 magnetic plane shutter
392 shutter coupling section
393 cassette cover rotary shaft
394 insertion opening
395 tape
396 label section
397 buzzer
398 magnetic recording area
399 screen printer
400 bar code printer
401 high Hc section
402 magnetic section
402a space section
403 magnetic section
404 key managing table
405 step of flow chart
406 key releasing decoder
407 voice extension block
408 personal computer
409 hard disk
410 install step
411 application
412 OS
413 BIOS
414 drive
415 interface
416 step of flow chart
321 optical file
422 magnetic file
436 network BIOS
437 LAN network
447 step of flow chart
447a step of flow chart
448 corrected data
449 display
450 key pad
451 error correction step
452 parity
453 C1 parity
454 C2 parity
455 Index
456 sub-code synchronism detecting section
457 index detecting section
458 divider
459 magnetic synchronizing signal detecting section
460 shortest/longest pulse detecting section
461 pseudo optical synchronizing signal generating
section
462 pseudo magnetic synchronizing signal generating
section
463 optical synchronizing signal detector
464 divider/multiplier
465 change-over switch
466 waveform shaping section
467 clock reproducing section
468 medium identifier
469 optical address information
470 data
514 spring
514a head elevation coupling means
514a head elevation inhibiting means
514c optical head travelling area
516 loading motor
517 loading gear
518 tray moving gear
519 head elevator
520 tray
521 opening and closing shaft for upper cover
522 menu image plane selection number table
523 playback control information
524 step of flow chart
525 list ID offset table
526 optical search information
527 magnetic track search information
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS A description will be made hereinbelow in terms of the embodiments of this invention. This invention involves various embodiments relating to an information recording system, information reproducing system, manufacturing method of an optical recording medium and optical recording medium which can realize a method and system for the prevention of illegal copy of an optical recording medium and illegal install of information on an optical recording medium. An original record fabricating apparatus, so-called mastering apparatus, for fabricating optical disks is included in the information recording system, and a reproducing apparatus such as a CD drive general users employ is included in the information reproducing system. In addition, a system such as a photo-magnetic recording type mini-disk (MD) reproducible and recordable at the user side is described as a recording and reproducing system, while the "recording" is different from the "recording" at fabrication of the original record. The following table shows the contents of the embodiments and the corresponding figures. First Embodiment Contents: A method of preventing a software from being illegally installed with a pirate edition preventing system according to this invention incorporated. Figure: FIG. 59 Second Embodiment Contents: A basic concept of a pirate edition preventing system according to this invention which uses, as first physical feature information, arrangement angle information of coordinate arrangements of pits for a specific signal on a recording medium. Figure: FIGS. 1, 5 Third Embodiment Contents: A method for employing, as first physical feature information, the information on a tracking quantity and pit depth on a recording medium. Figure: FIGS. 13, 16, 20 Fourth Embodiment Contents: A recording method by a second low-reflection section. 1. A method wherein a second low-reflection section is used as first physical feature information in the second embodiment. 2. A method of recording a first cipher with a plurality of second low-reflection sections being set on the basis of a modulated signal on an optical recording medium. Figure: FIGS. 38 to 40 Fifth Embodiment Contents: 1. A method wherein an error signal is used as the first physical feature information in the second embodiment. 2. A method wherein a special (EFM) code is used as the first physical feature information in the second embodiment. Figure: FIGS. 54 to 56 Sixth Embodiment Contents: A method of limiting the install with encryption is made by a combination of the first physical feature information and a sub-cipher number. Figure: FIG. 58 Seventh Embodiment Contents: Another data recording system and producing method for a second low-reflection section, which is different from the fourth embodiment. Figure: FIG. 60 Eighth Embodiment Contents: A method wherein an arrangement state of inphase pits is employed as the first physical feature in the second embodiment (three-point coincidence system). Figure: FIGS. 60 to 63, 92, 94 Ninth Embodiment Contents: A method of detecting dust which exists in a first cipher recording area, and a method of displaying the position of the dust. Figure: FIG. 64 Tenth Embodiment Contents: A method wherein an offset voltage signal is employed as the first physical feature information in the second embodiment. Figure: FIG. 31 Eleventh Embodiment Contents: A method of stopping the operation of an illegal copy program. Figure: FIGS. 69, 770 to 74 Twelfth Embodiment Contents: A method of preventing a scramble from being released at illegal use with the first physical feature information and a scramble key being encrypted by a one direction function. Figure: FIGS. 77 to 79 Thirteenth Embodiment Contents: 1. A method of providing a plurality of cipher decoders on a ROM. 2. A method of using an elliptic function as the one direction function in the second embodiment. Figure: FIGS. 83, 86 Fourteenth Embodiment Contents: A method of fabricating an original record wherein recording is made from the outer circumferential portion to the inner circumferential portion, the first physical feature information is measured and the first cipher is recorded at the inner circumferential portion. Figure: FIGS. 88, 89 First Embodiment The first embodiment relates to a system and method for the prevention of illegal duplication from a CD or CD-ROM or illegal copy of a program on a CD-ROM to more than the legal number of personal computers. First, a detailed description will be made in terms of a method of releasing a key (unlocking) to execute a specific program recorded on an optical disk such as a CD-ROM which contains a number of programs keys such as passwords. Since a CD as shown in FIG. 59 employs a disk copy preventing (protection) method according to this invention which will be described hereinafter with reference to FIGS. 70 to 72, difficulty is encountered to duplicate the CD. In addition, on an optical mark section 387 there is recorded an ID Number which is different at every disk. This ID number is read through an optical sensor 386 comprising a light-emitting section 389a and a light-receiving section 389b to obtain, for example, data "204312001" which in turn, is inputted into a disk ID number (OPT) item of a key managing table 404 in a memory of a reading CPU. Although this method is usually effective, there is a possibility that an illegally duplicating traders concerned make the duplication by means of a printing machine. Moreover, in order to improve the duplication preventing effect, an extremely high Hc section 401 such as a 40000e material made of barium ferrite is provided so as to magnetically record the magnetic ID Number (Mag) data "205162" in the factory. This data is reproducible with a common magnetic head, and the reproduced data is put in the disk ID number (Mag) item of the key managing table 404. As shown in FIG. 8A which is an illustration of a process to record an ID number, the employment of a magnetizing device 540 as shown in FIGS. 9A to 9D permits the time required for the process to record the ID number on a recording medium 2 to become below 1 second. This magnetizing device 540 has a ring-like configuration as shown in FIG. 9A and has a plurality of magnetizing poles 542a to 542f as illustrated in FIGS. 9C and 9D which are enlarged views, coils 545a to 545f being wound around the magnetizing poles 542a to 542f, respectively. This plurality of magnetizing poles 542a to 542f are some of the whole magnetizing poles, and all the magnetizing poles are approximately 100 in number, for example. The current from a magnetizing current generator 543 flows through a current direction switching device 544 so that currents flowing in preset directions advance into the coils 545a to 545f, thus allowing the magnetization to be accomplished in a desired direction at every pole. FIG. 9D shows an example that the magnetizing directions are set to establish S, N, S, S, N, S poles from the left side. In this case, on a magnetic recording layer 3 there are in an instant formed magnetically recorded signals in the directions indicated by arrows 51a, 51b, 51c and 51d. It is possible to record the signals even on a high Hc magnetic material such as a 40000e material. Accordingly, the time needed for the process shown in FIG. 8A is substantially equal to that for a conventional process shown in FIG. 8B, with no lengthened time for the production of a CD. In a method wherein an ID number is magnetically recorded through a magnetic head while the recording medium 2 rotates, the time required for the start-up of rotation of the medium 2, several turns of the medium and the stopping of the rotation is several seconds. For this reason, there is a problem in that difficulty is experienced to introduce it to a CD mass production process, in which the processing time for giving the ID number is approximately 1 second, without changing the flow of the process. In FIG. 8A which is the illustration of the process for giving an ID number, the employment of the magnetizing device 540 illustrated in FIGS. 9A to 9D allows the process time for recording the ID number on the medium 2 to be less than 1 second, with the result that this is more suitable for a process which has a fast through put. The recording operation of the magnetizing device 540 is as follows. That is, as described above the current direction switching device 544 permits currents to flow into the coils 545a to 545f in desired directions, which achieves arbitrary magnetizing directions. Since the FIGS. 9A to 9D magnetizing device 540 allows the flows of the currents to the respective coils 545a to 545f in set directions, it is possible to obtain a set magnetizing direction to make a different pattern at every disk. In FIG. 9D, the magnetizing directions are set to make a pattern of S, N, S, S, N, S poles from the left side, in which case the magnetic recording layer 3 instantaneously has the magnetically recorded signals on its specific track in the arrow 51a, 51b, 51c, 51d directions for several milliseconds. Accepting a large current, magnetizing devices make it possible to accomplish the recording even on a high Hc magnetic material such as 40000e. Accordingly, as illustrated in FIG. 8A, the operating time for the recording the ID number is approximately the same as that in the prior FIG. 8B process and, hence, the CD production is possible without changing the flow of the process at all. In addition, in the case of the use of the magnetizing device 540, since the ID number can magnetically be recorded with no relation of the medium 2, it is possible to reduce the through put in the process, as well as to accomplish the accurate printing in the printing process after the recording of the ID number of the FIG. 8A because of no rotation of the medium 2. At present, a magnetic head is commercially available which permits the recording on a magnetic recording layer whose Hc is about 27000e. Thus, when Hc is low, there arises a problem in that the revision of the ID number is possible. On the other hand, the magnetizing device 540 generally generates a strong magnetic field, which allows the magnetic recording layer 3 having as high Hc as 40000e to permit the recording of the ID number, thereby eliminating such a problem. In the case where the ID number is recorded in a specific track of the high Hc magnetic recording layer 3, since the ID number of this medium is not rewritable, i.e., can not be revised, through a usually available magnetic head 8, it is possible to ensure a higher degree of security for the password related to the ID number of the medium. Furthermore, according to this invention, as illustrated in FIG. 10, a mixer 547 mixes a signal from a unique ID number generator 546 with the data on a physical configuration table (the first physical feature information) 532 of a disk so as to make difficult the separation therebetween if there is no key, the mixture signal, together with a separation key, being fed to an encrypting device 537 and the resulting cipher 538 being recorded on a magnetic recording track 67 in a magnetic recording area of a disk after the formation process for the disk or recorded on an optical recording track 65 in the original record formation process. The magnetic recording track 67 and optical recording track 65 are provided in an area different from the main information recording area. For instance, they are placed at an inner circumferential section or outer circumferential section of the disk, and for the magnetic track 67, they may be located on the surface opposite to the optical recording layer surface. The aforesaid physical configuration table 532 will sometimes be described as a physical arrangement table. In the recording and reproducing system 1 side, a cipher decoder 543 decrypts the cipher and a separation device 549 separates the ID number 550 from the disk physical arrangement table 532 by means of the separation key to check the illegal disk according to the illegal disk check method according to this invention, which will be described later with reference to FIGS. 70 to 71, thereby stopping the operation of the illegal disk. In the case of the FIG. 10 method, the cipher (first cipher) 538 to be recorded on the magnetic recording track 67 is based on the mixture signal of the ID number created by the unique ID number generator 546 and the disk physical arrangement table, thus being different at every disk. As a matter of course, this disk employs the illegal duplication preventing method according to this invention which will be described later with reference to FIGS. 5 and 7, whereby the illegal duplication traders concerned can not illegally duplicate the optical recording section of a CD. Accordingly, even if taking one sheet of normal disk to try to illegally use the legal disk a person can not illegally use it except for the revision of its ID number. If there is a disk fabricated on the basis of an original record corresponding to a disk whose password is known, the fabrication of the same disk is possible with the same first cipher being recorded in the magnetic recording section. This means that the employment of the password causes the illegal use. If the first cipher of the disk physical arrangement table and the ID cipher of the ID number are recorded separately, the same first cipher of the physical arrangement table is recorded on the magnetic recording layers of all the disks due to the same original record, whereby people can readily find that it is a disk due to the same original record. For this reason, when the ID cipher of the ID number is rewritten with the ID cipher of the ID number whose password is known, there is a possibility that the illegal use easily take place. However, According to the FIG. 10 method, a plurality of different original records are present with respect to one title, and further, even if the disks are fabricated through the same original record, the first cipher is entirely different at every disk, which makes it difficult to recognize from the first cipher that two disks are due to the same original record. First, a description will be made in terms of the principle of making it difficult to find, on the basis of the first cipher, a disk fabricated by the same original record. Although many pieces of first physical feature information of the original record are detectable, the recording capacity of the disk 2 shows limitation. Moreover, even if first physical feature information requiring a large capacity are recorded, the decryption may take much time. The time allowed for the decryption is approximately 1 second, thus limiting the data quantity of the first cipher. For this reason, actually the first physical feature information of the disk results in being obtained by the selection of a portion from the first physical feature information obtained. That is, the first physical feature information is obtainable by the selection of one from a number of selective values. In this illustration, the selective value is changed at every disk by a physical information selecting means 532a shown in FIG. 10. Therefore, even if the disks are due to the same original record, each of the disks has a different first physical feature information so that the first ciphers are different from each other. As described above, some original records are usually fabricated in terms of one software, and each of the disks has a different first psychical feature information. From the above, the probability that the disks has the same first cipher becomes extremely low, thereby making it impossible to find a disk due to the same original record even if the first cipher data is available. Finding, it requires the measurement of the physical feature information of the disk. Thus, it is difficult for a general user to find a disk due to the same original record. Furthermore, according to this invention, as described with reference to FIG. 10, the first physical feature information and different ID number given at every disk are enciphered together. Accordingly, even if a disk whose decryption password is known is obtained to replace the first cipher of this disk with the first cipher of another disk, its operation stops by means of the pirate edition preventing program except that the first physical feature information, i.e., the original record, is not the same. Therefore, it does not operate at all. In the FIG. 10 method, since difficulty is encountered to find a disk fabricated by the same original record, the general users can not almost do the revision of the ID, thus preventing the general users from doing the illegal use. There is no way except that the information on the disk physical arrangement table 532 are read out from the whole area of the disk so as to check as to whether or not the same original record is used. For checking all the data on the address, angular arrangement, tracking, pit depth and error rate, the time is also required for confirmation. Accordingly, it is difficult for the illegal duplication traders concerned to find a disk fabricated by an original record which produced a disk such as a CD whose password is known, which makes it difficult that the illegal duplication traders concerned revises the ID number. A concrete procedure will then be described with reference to a flow chart of FIG. 80. FIG. 69 is a block diagram of the whole including a CPU 665 and a magnetic recording and reproducing means, the operations of the parts of which will be described hereinafter. In FIG. 80, in a step 405, in response to the input of a start-up command for the program No. N to the CPU 665, the CPU 665 executes a step 405a to read as to whether or not the key information for the program is recorded on a magnetic track. At this time, a recording current is made to flow through the magnetic head 8 so as to erase that data. In the case of the legal disk 2, the key information is not erasable for that Hc is high. On the other hand, if it is an illegal disk, the key information disappears. Then, a step 405b is executed in order to check whether or not the key data, i.e., a password, exists. If the answer is "NO", the user receives a key input command on a screen as shown in FIG. 81, then followed by a step 405d where the user inputs, for example, "123456" which in turn, is checked as to whether it is in the right or not in a step 405e. If the answer is "NO", in a step 405f the operation stops and a display is made on a display section 16 to indicate that the key is not in the right or it is a duplicated disk. On the other hand, if the answer is "YES", the operational flow goes to a step 405g in which the key data for allowing the execution of the program No. N is recorded on a magnetic track on the recording medium 2, subsequently followed by a step 405i. In this invention, an ID mark such as a bar code is provided on a surface opposite to the optical reading surface of an optical disk as shown in FIG. 59, or a bar code 619 is provided on the optical reading surface as shown in FIG. 49. Returning back to the step 405b, if the answer is "YES", the operational flow advances to a step 405h to read the key data for the program No. N, and then proceeds to the step 405i to read the disk ID (OPT) on the optical recording layer, and further goes to a step 504j to read the disk ID (mag) on the magnetic recording layer, and still further enters into a step 405 to check whether they are in the right or not. If the decision shows "NO", a step 405m is executed to display "duplicated disk", then terminating the operation. On the other hand, if the decision indicates "YES", a step 405n is executed in order to make the decryption calculation for the key data, disk ID (OPT) and disk ID (Mag), then followed by a step 405p to check whether the data are in the right or not. If the answer is "NO", an error display is made in a step 405q. If the answer is "YES", the use of the program No. N starts in a step 405s. In the case of using this method according to this invention, if for CDs 120 tunes each being voice-compressed to 1/5 are recorded and for game softs several hundreds of titles are recorded so that 12 tunes or one game can initially be listened, they can be released at the cost corresponding to the copyright fee for 12 tunes or one game. Further, when the user paid the fee afterwards, the soft trader informs him of the key for the ID No. of the disk, which allows the use of additional softs such as tunes and games as shown in FIG. 59. In this case, the employment of a sound expansion block 407 permits music soft containing a maximum of 120 tunes to be recorded on one CD, for that the sound expansion expands the recording quantity to five times, i.e., 370 minutes. Thus, the user can listen to a favorite tune from the recorded tunes when unlocked. Once the key is unlocked, the key data is recorded so that there is no need to always use the key. This method is applicable to electronic dictionaries general programs other than the music CDs and game CDs, providing the same effects. For reducing the cost, it is also possible to omit the ID No. for the high Hc section 401. Second Embodiment Secondly, a description will be made in terms of a second embodiment which relates to a method of preventing the duplication of a CD itself, i.e., preventing the production of the so-called pirate CD by the illegal copy of the legal CD. In this embodiment, the two-dimensional arrangement of pits of a disk is treated as the first physical feature information. Nowadays, CDs are illegally duplicated in various manners to produce pirate CDs which in turn, are put in the market, and a way of preventing the duplication is needed. Difficulty is experienced to prevent the duplication only with softwares such as encryption. The second embodiment prevents the duplication utilizing a cipher and a pit arrangement of a CD. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a mastering apparatus for fabricating an original record for CLV type optical disks. The mastering apparatus 529 comprises a linear velocity control section 26a whereby an optical head 6 generates an optical beam to exposure-record latent images of pits on a photosensitive surface of a disk 2 while the linear velocity is kept within the range of 1.2 m/s to 1.4 m/s for CDs. For CDs, a tracking circuit 24 increases the radius r in pitch of about 1.6 .mu.m per revolution so that the pits are recorded spirally. Thus, the data are recorded spirally on an original record as shown in FIG. 3A. In the case of a CAV optical disk such as a video disk, an original disk is reproduced and an original record is fabricated through rotational control completely connected with the rotation of the original disk. Accordingly, if the third party gets master data 528, the mastering apparatus 529 can easily fabricate an original record for an optical disk having the completely same pattern as a legally manufactured CAV optical disk. For CAV, the difference in pit pattern between the legally manufactured original record and the illegally fabricated original record becomes below several .mu.m. For this reason, the conventional method can not distinguish between the legally fabricated optical disk and the illegally produced optical disk on the basis of the physical arrangement of a pit pattern. On the other hand, for CLV optical disks such as CD-ROMs, the pits are spirally recorded on an original record at an initially set constant linear velocity ranging from 1.2 to 1.4 m/s. In the case of CAV, the amount of data to be recorded per revolution is always constant, while in the case of CLV the data amount per revolution varies as the linear velocity varies. When the linear velocity is low, the data arrangement 530a as shown in FIG. 3A takes place, and when the linear velocity is high, the data arrangement 530b as shown in FIG. 3B occurs. Thus, according to the normal mastering apparatus, there comes out the difference in data arrangement between the legal CD and illegal copied CD. In the mastering apparatus for the common CDs commercially available, the linear velocity can be set with accuracy as high as 0.001 m/s, and the original record is made with a constant linear velocity. However, even if the original record for 74-minute CDs is fabricated with such a high accuracy at the linear velocity of 1.2 m/s, when the error is shifted to the plus side at the outermost circumferential track, an error corresponding to 11.783 revolutions takes place. That is, as compared with the ideal original record, the original record to be fabricated has the data arrangement 530b whose angular error is 11.783 revolutions .times.360 degrees at the outermost circumferential track. Accordingly, as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, the legal CD and illegal CD have different data arrangements 530, i.e., different A1 to A26 addresses 323a to 323x. For instance, when the CD is divided into four sections to define Z1 to Z4 arrangement zones 531, the arrangement zones 531 of the A1 to A26 addresses 323 are different from each other. Accordingly, when a corresponding table between the arrangement zones 531 and the addresses 323 for two CDs are drawn out, as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B it is found that the physical position tables 532a and 532b of the legal CD and illegally duplicated CD are different from each other. This difference allows distinguishing between the illegally duplicated CD and the legal CD. However, even if a CD is fabricated which is hard to duplicate, the effect comes down if the method of checking the legal CD is in easy revision. According to this invention, as shown in FIG. 5, the physical position table 532 is made during the fabrication of the CD original record or after the completion of production of the original record. This physical arrangement table 532 is encrypted by an encryption means 537 on the basis of a one direction function such as an RSA type disclosure cipher key and then recorded in an optical ROM section 65 of the CD medium 2 or in the magnetic recording track 67 of the CD medium 2a. Subsequently, in the drive side, a cipher signal 538b is reproduced from the CD medium 2 or 2a and the physical arrangement table 532 is restored using a decryption program 534 reproduced from the optical recording section of the CD. Further, disk rotational (turning) angle information 335 corresponding to the actual CD address 38a is obtained on the basis of an index or a rotational pulse signal from the aforesaid FG by using a disk check program 533a similarly reproduced from the CD and checked with the data of the physical arrangement table 532. If OK, the operation starts. If NO, a decision is made such that it is an illegally duplicated CD, thus stopping the operation of soft programs or the reproduction of the music softs. In the illegally copied CD shown in FIG. 33B, the physical position table 532b is different from that of the legal CD, whereby the CD is rejected. The illegally duplicated CD does not come into operation except for the decryption of a cipher decrypting program 537. Accordingly, even though the cipher signal is copied, the rejection takes place. Thus, it is possible to almost completely prevent the reproduction of the illegally copied CD. There may be three ways the illegal duplication traders concerned can take as countermeasures: 1) fabricating a CLV disk original record having the totally same pit pattern; 2) decrypting the cipher encode program of the secrete key shown in FIG. 5 by means of the cipher decode program 534; 3) analyzing all the programs in the CD-ROM to replace the cipher decode program 534 and disk check program 533a by the program revision. Of these three ways, the third way is meaningless because the program decryption and program revision need much time, i.e., large cost. In addition, according to this invention, the cipher decode program 534 and disk check program 533a are placed in the media side but not in the drive side, and hence they can changed at every title or press of the CD-ROM. Accordingly, since the investment for the program decryption and cipher decryption is needed at every title, the illegal traders are unprofitable so that the duplication can be prevented from the economical aspect. Further, a description is made in terms of the second way. This invention employs a one direction function such as the RSA type disclosure cipher key shown in FIG. 5. For example, the employment of the equation C=E (M)=Memodn is possible. Thus, even if the cipher decode program, i.e., one key, is in disclosure on the CD-ROM, the decryption of the cipher encode program 537 which is the other key takes incredible time and hence is substantially impossible. Although there is a possibility that the information on the cipher encode program 537 leaks, in the FIG. 5 method the cipher decode program 534 is present at the media side but not at the drive side. Accordingly, even in case that it leaks, by changing both the pair of cipher programs, the duplication preventing effect is easily restorable. Finally, the first way of fabricating the CLV original record having the completely same pattern is difficult because, although one-pulse rotational signal emerges per revolution, the current CLV mastering apparatus 529 does not include a means to detect the rotational angle with high accuracy for control. In this case, with the rotational angle information and recorded signal being read out from the duplication source, i.e., CD, to take the synchronization with the rotational pulses during the duplication, a similar pit patter can be drawn with some degree of positional accuracy, but not exactly. However, this is possible only in the case where the recording on the duplication source CD is effected at the same linear velocity. In the mastering apparatus 529 according to this invention, as shown in FIG. 1 a CLV modulation signal generating section 10a generates a CLV modulation signal which in turn, is supplied to a linear velocity modulating section 26a in some case and a time-axis modulating section 37a of an optical recording circuit 37 in some case for CLV modulation. The linear velocity modulating section 26a modulates, at random, the linear velocity at 1.2 m/s to 1.4 m/s which are within the CD standard range as shown in FIG. 2A. This can similarly be realized even if the time-axis modulating section 37a modulates the signal while the linear velocity is constant, in which case there is no need for the modification of the apparatus. Difficulty is encountered to detect with high accuracy the linear velocity modulation from the duplication source CD. Even the mastering apparatus which made the original record can not duplicate it, for that the recording is performed at random without controlled. The original record always varies. For this reason, it is almost impossible to completely duplicate the CD involving the linear velocity modulation according to this invention. However, since the linear velocity from 1.2 to 1.4 m/s for CDs is in the standard range, the data is reproducible by means of the common CD-ROM player currently put on the market. Let it be assumed that ass shown in FIG. 2B, the same data is recorded on a specific optical track 65a at a constant linear velocity of 1.2 m/s and, when the start point is taken as S, the end point A1 of the recorded data takes a position of 360 degrees. In this case, if as shown in FIG. 2C the linear velocity evenly increases from 1.2 m/s to 1.4 m/s during one revolution, the physical position 539a of the address A3 comes to the physical position 539a shifted by 30 degrees. Further, the linear velocity increases during 1/2 revolution, it comes to the physical position 539c shifted by 45 degrees. This means that the position is changeable by a maximum of 45 degrees during one revolution. Since the common CLV mastering apparatus can generate only one rotational pulse per revolution, the positional error is accumulated up to 90 degrees during two revolutions. Even if in the future the illegal duplication traders carries out the rotation control, the positional deviation of 90 degrees occurs between the legal original record and illegally copied original record by means of the linear velocity modulation according to this invention. Detecting this positional deviation allows the illegally copied CD. The position deviation detecting resolution is set to be below 90 degrees. Accordingly, in the case where the linear velocity is changed in the range from 1.2 to 1.4 m/s, when as illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B four 90-degree division zones Z1, Z2, Z3 and Z4 are set, the detection of the illegal CD is possible. If dividing more than four, its effect improves. Naturally, if a CLV mastering apparatus having an extremely high accuracy would newly be developed, the illegal traders can make the wholly same pit pattern. However, only several companies in the world can develop such an apparatus and, therefore, it is not required for the ordinary use purposes. If the shipment of such a mastering apparatus is limited for the purposes of protecting the copyright owner, the complete prevention of the illegal copy is possible. Furthermore, In the mastering apparatus equipped with a rotational angle sensor 17a as shown in FIG. 1, the physical position table 532 is made out on the basis of the address information 32a of the input data and positional information 32b on the rotational angle from a motor 17, and then encrypted through the cipher encoder 537 and further recorded at the outermost circumferential portion of the original record 2M by means of the optical recording circuit 37. Thus, the physical arrangement table 532 encrypted is recorded on an optical track 65 of the FIG. 5 disk 2 during the formation of the original record. Accordingly, this disk is reproducible even by an ordinary CD-ROM drive not having a magnetic head. In this case, as illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6, the drive is required to include a disk rotational angle sensor 335. This detecting means is useful if only detecting the relative position of the address 323 and 90-degree zone, and hence a complicated sensor such as a angular sensor is not always needed. The relative position detecting method will be described with reference to FIG. 4. For example, as shown in (a) of FIG. 4 the rotational pulse from the motor or the index signal from the optical sensor once generates per revolution of the disk. This interval is time-divided as shown in (b) of FIG. 4 so that, in the case of six-divided zones, the signal position time slots Z1 to Z6 are given. On the other hand, as described before the address signals 323a, 323b are obtainable from the sub-code of the reproduced signal. A signal position indicating signal is effective to detect that the address A1 exists in the zone Z1 and the address A2 is present in the zone Z3. In this case, the structure becomes simple when the rotation signal or zone signal is recorded in the sub-code, while the data can entirely be duplicated, which destroys the duplication preventing effect. Accordingly, the provision of a means to detect the rotational angle at a place other than the optical recording section like this invention can offer a high duplication preventing effect. Returning back to FIG. 6, in the recording and reproducing system, the signal is reproduced by an optical reproducing circuit 38, and if the physical arrangement table 532 is present in the optical track, in the FIG. 7 flow chart the operational flow advances from a steps 471b to 471e. If the answer of the step 471b is "NO", the step 471c is executed in order to check whether the cipher data exists in the magnetic recording section 67. If "NO", the operational flow goes to a step 471r to give a permission for the start-up. On the other hand, if "YES", the operational flow proceeds to the steps 471d, 471e to reproduce the cipher and to start the decryption program of the cipher decoder 534 recorded on the ROM of the drive or on the disk for the decryption, then followed by a step 471f to make out the physical arrangement table 532, i.e., the zone-address table (An: Zn). A step 471w is for checking whether or not the disk check program is in the media. If the decision is "NO", the operational flow advances to a step 471p. If the decision is "YES", the operational flow proceeds to a step 471g to start the disk check program recorded within the disk. In the disk check program (the step 471f), a step 471h is first executed to set n=0, and then a step 471i is implemented to set n=n+1, and further a step 471j is performed to search the address An of the disk 2 in the drive side for reproduction. In a step 471k, the positional information Z'n is detected and outputted by the foregoing position detecting means 335, and in a step 471m a check is made as to whether Z'n=Zn. If "NO", the operational flow goes to a step 471u to decide that it is an illegally copied CD and further to issue an indication of "illegally copied CD" to the display section 16, then followed by a step 471s for stopping. On the other hand, if the decision of the step 471m is "YES", the operational flow goes to a step 471n to check whether n=the last. If "NO", the operational flow returns to the step 471i. If "YES", the operational flow advances to the step 471p. The step 471p checks whether or not the disk check program is placed in the drive side ROM or RAM. If the decision is "NO", the step 471r is executed to start the soft. On the other hand, if "YES", a step 471q is implemented to run the disk check program. The operational content is the same as a step 471t. Thus, if the answer is "NO", the operational flow advances to the steps 471u and 471s. If the answer is "YES", the step 471r is implemented to start to reproduce the soft within the disk. In the case where the CD player which is currently in production reproduces a disk whose linear velocity varies between 1.2 to 1.4 m/s, there is not problem in reproducing the original signal. On the other hand, the mastering apparatus can do the cutting with a considerable linear velocity accuracy above 0.001 m/s. Thus, as the standard for the mastering apparatus there has been provided the CD standard in which the linear velocity=.+-.0.01 m/s. If conforming with the this CD standard, as shown in FIGS. 11A and 11B the linear velocity can increase, for example, from 1.20 m/s to 1.22 m/s within the standard. In this case, as shown in FIGS. 11C and 11D the angular physical arrangement of the same address is shifted by an angle of 5.9 degrees per revolution of the disk from 539a to 539b. When as shown in FIG. 13 a rotational angle sensor 335 which detects the angle shift of 5.9 degrees is provided in the recording and reproducing system side, the physical arrangement difference is distinguishable. For CDs, the rotational angle sensor 335 is useful which has a resolution of 6 degrees, i.e., which angle-divides one revolution into more than 60. The arrangement of this rotational angle sensor 335 is illustrated in the FIG. 16 block diagram of the recording and reproducing system. Since a pulse emerging from a rotational angle-sensor 17a such as a FG of the motor 17 is time-divided by a time-division circuit 553a of an angular position detecting section 553 of a disk physical arrangement detecting section 556, even if only one rotational pulse signal is obtainable per revolution, when for example the time accuracy is .+-.5%, it can be divided into 20, which ensures the angular resolution about 18 degrees. This operation was described above with reference to FIGS. 4A, 4B and 4C. Since for CDs an eccentricity of .+-.200 .mu.m takes place, an angle measurement error appears due to the eccentricity. In the case of a CD according to the CD standard, the angle measurement error of a maximum of 0.8 degrees occurs at P--P due to the eccentricity. Accordingly, if the angle measurement resolution of 1 degree is needed, the measurement becomes impossible. When a high angular resolution is needed in order to avoid this problem, an eccentric quantity detecting section 553c is provided in the angular position detecting section 553 in FIG. 16 to measure the eccentric amount so that the correction calculation is made in an eccentric quantity correction section 553b to eliminate the influence from the eccentricity. A description will be made in terms of the detection of the eccentric quantity and the calculation of the correction amount. When no eccentricity occurs as shown in FIG. 19A, the center of a triangle made by three points A, B, C on one circle is coincident with the real center 557 of the disk under the condition that .theta.a=.theta.b=.theta.c. Actually, as shown in FIG. 19B an eccentricity 559 takes place due to the eccentricity of the disk and the variation in the mounting of the disk. As shown in FIG. 19B, the relative angles of the three point addresses A, B, C are detected by the angle sensor 353, whereby the difference L'a between the rotational center 558 of the disk and the real disk center 557 can be calculated as L'a=f (.theta.a, .theta.b, .theta.c). The eccentricity correction section 553b corrects, using the calculated eccentric amount, the rotational angle signal from the rotational angle sensor 17a. This can eliminate the adverse influence from the eccentricity so as to improve the accuracy so that the angular resolution is below 1 degree, thereby improving the detection accuracy of the illegal disk. In the case where the detection of the angular position is made with the resolution as low as 6 degrees as mentioned before, the decision between the legal and illegal disks is required to be strict. In particular, if the decision is made such that the legal disk is the illegal disk, the legal users suffer large damage. It is absolutely needed to avoid it. For this reason, as illustrated in steps 551t, 551u, 551v of the FIG. 14 flow chart, the access to the address of the disk which has been decided as an illegal disk is made two or more times for reproduction and check, whereby it is possible to avoid the wrong decision. The basic portion of the FIG. 14 flow chart is the same as the FIG. 7 flow chart, and only additional portions are described and the description of the portions other than the additional portions is omitted for simplicity. When in a step 551 a decision is made such that the value is out of the allowable range, in the step 551t the access to the address An is again made plural times, then followed by the step 551u to detect the zone number Z'n indicative of the relative angle with respect to the address An, and further followed by the step 551v to check plural times whether or not the value is within the allowable range. If the decision is "YES", the disk is considered as a legal disk, and the operational flow goes to a step 551s. On the other hand, if the decision is "NO", it is considered as an illegal disk, and the operational flow advances to the steps 471u and 471s to inhibit the operation of the program. In addition, if a statistic process is added for the prevention of the wrong decision, the decision accuracy improves. In FIG. 12A, in the legal original record the frequency distributions of angle-address, angle-tracking direction, address-tracking direction, angle-pit depth and address-pit depth read out become as illustrated in a graph (1). Accordingly, in the case where specific data are selected and reproduced by a player as shown in a graph (2), easily discriminable sample address data are selected. As shown in FIG. 12B the formed disk is reproduced to find signal sections, indicated with black color, which are out of the allowable range, and further to strike the abnormal values, which are out of the allowable range, off a list as shown by a graph (4). Although in the illustration the frequency distribution of angle-address arrangement is indicated, the same effect is also obtainable in terms of the frequency distribution of pit depth or address-tracking quantity. This permits the copy prevention signal section hard to discriminate, i.e., easy to made a mistake to be eliminated from the list, which reduces the mistake during the reproduction by the reproducing player. That is, the mistake probability decreases with the access to the address of the disk decided as illegality being made two or more times. On the other hand, in FIG. 12C, in the original record illegally duplicated, since the address of the formed disk is read out to fabricate the original record, a copy protect signal (CP) signal generates which distributes in a given range at a constant probability as shown in a graph (5). In this case, since the disk physical arrangement table can not be revised as described before, the data selection as seen in the graph (2) is impossible. Accordingly, in the physical arrangement of the illegal original record the data are considerably close to the limits of the allowable range or the CP signal exists out of the allowable range. As shown in FIG. 12D, in the optical disk formed from the illegal original record there occur errors due to the formation variation which cause a distribution as shown in a graph (6). In the graph (6), the physical arrangement signal 552b exceeding the allowable value develops as indicated by black color. Since the physical arrangement signal 552b inherent in the illegal disk is detectable through the disk check program, the operation of the program stops, thereby preventing the use of the copied disk. The distribution of the angle-address CP signal disperses within a narrow range. On the other hand, in the case of the pit depth shown in FIG. 17B, the depth greatly varies in accordance with the cutting and formation condition, and it is considerably difficult to control this with precision. Therefore, the yield of the illegally duplicated disk at manufacturing sharply drops. For this reason, in the case of the pit depth, strong copy pr | ||||||
